September 17, 2005

  • Let's see ... it's been about two weeks since the last blog
    entry.  A couple of people have asked me (in person) about the
    lipid stuff I was working on.  It was encouraging to be reminded
    that there are other "story junkies" out there, who find no peace until
    they've completed a book/movie/etc.

    Well, time for the first disappoint:  I don't have the answer
    yet.  We did get a download of additional data that was more
    detailed than the standard lab reports (thanks to the generous sharing
    of the lead science officer at the company doing the lab tests). 
    The results we saw using the more detailed data were provocative, but
    unfortunately the 400+ number of people in the current study is just
    not enough to answer the question we are asking. 

    (Sidebar:  it will likely be enough to answer whether or not there
    is added benefit to the people taking the drug being studied, but not
    enough to answer this tangential question.) 

    (Second sidebar:  In astronomy, if you can't see a particular
    asterism, say the whirlpool galaxy for example, you get a bigger
    telescope.  The equivalent in the statistical world is the number
    of people in your study.  If you can see a difference between two
    groups but the difference isn't significant, you probably need more
    people in order to see the difference.)

    We got to the point on 9 September, recognizing that we couldn't pin
    down the effect with the current study, and so we turned our attention
    to other things.  However, I did mention to the head of science at
    the company providing the lab test info that, if he came across a
    larger study that would let us examine the question again, let me know.

    Not quite end of story.  The next Monday I get an email from my
    new friend at the company that does the lab tests.  It seems he
    was just given permission to use the dataset from a larger study that
    his firm has been providing with lab tests.  He normally works
    with a statistician friend who is at the CDC, but that fellow is
    currently swamped.  So, he wondered if I would be interested in
    helping him.  He has a specific target in mind and part of what I
    would get out of the partnership is an opportunity to chase down the
    effect I saw in a larger study - about 1600 people this time.

    Obviously, there is a lot of "hand waving" going on here.  No
    names, etc.  It's the nature of the beast that you don't talk
    about people or companies without their permission, at least not until
    the joint work appears in press (and is obvious anyway at that point) -
    which tends to take months to a year.  But life goes on and you
    realize that God is much more in control of the overall process of life
    and research than you are.

Comments (2)

  • Asterism - from the Greek word aster, meaning star or object in the heavens - but which in the English language refers to constellations, not stars or objects in the heavens. A bigger telescope doesn't usually help you see constellations better, since they are often larger than the field of view of a telescope. But it makes a big difference for so-called "deek sky objects" like galaxies.

  • Hey Pete

    If you are like me you wonder who reads these Blogs... my site is under the user name of  bogota1041 if you want to ck out my site on here.. Pray things are going well...

    Greg Waite

Comments are closed.

Post a Comment